HOME - Clinical cases - Restorative dentistry
 
 
26 January 2021

Clinical evaluation of class II restorations vs semi-direct restorations: a randomized clinical trial

Co-authors: A. Comba, F. Del Bianco

Lorenzo Breschi


Direct composite restorations are considered an excellent solution for posterior teeth rehabilitation. However, in some cases, despite the evolution of adhesive systems and composite materials, a correct rehabilitation of the proximal wall, especially when the cavity design presents an important bucco-lingual width, could be considered a challenge. 

In literature there is no consensus on which protocol is more suitable in these cases: direct, indirect or semi-direct approach. For that reason, Dr Rocha Gomes Torres et al. from Brasil, decided to compare the clinical performance of posterior class II restorations  performed with direct and semidirect techniques over a period of 24 month.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
The authors conducted a splith-mouth study on thirty patients who received two class II restorations (n = 60) using a nanohybrid composite with two different restorative techniques direct (DT), and semidirect (SDT).
The researchers applied the same adhesive system for all restorations. For DT, the restorative material was applied directly inside the tooth preparation. For SDT, an impression of the tooth preparation design was obtained using alginate and a silicone flexible die was prepared. The restoration was made chairside on the model and additionally light cured. After that, it was cemented in preparation using a resinous cement. All restorations were evaluated by the authors using the FDI criteria after 7 days, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS
After 24 months, 24 patients attended the recall and the Brazilian researchers evaluated 48 restorations using FDI criteria. The group of prof Rocha Gomes Torres analyzed all collected data and performed Fisher’s statistical analysis (5%) that showed no difference between the techniques. 

CONCLUSIONS
After a 24-month follow-up, the authors obtained no differences between the tested techniques and the restorations performed with both techniques produced clinically acceptable restorations.
Rocha Gomes Torres et al. demonstrated the viability of applying two different operatory techniques (direct and semidirect) for class II restorations.


For more informations: A randomized clinical trial of class II composite restorations using direct and semidirect techniques. 

Related articles

Co-author: Federica Florenzano

In patients requiring an indirect restoration, the  proximal box is often below the surrounding gingival margin and close, or even below, the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Deep margins may...


Authors: Dr. Martignoni, Prof. Grandini

The restoration of the endodontically treated molar has always been a debated topic. The clinician faces many different challenges and it is important to know how to...


38-year-old male patient with negative medical history, who comes for a visit many years after the last dental check-up. He reports difficulty in removing food...


Read more

USA     18 June 2021 - 30 November 0001

ADHA Annual Conference 2021

June 18-20, 2021. Phoenix, Arizona.

As the largest event dedicated to dental hygienists, this meeting is just for you! 


The treatment of palatal displaced canines (PDCs) is one of the most challenging treatments in orthodontic dental care. The invasive and long-lasting treatment often requires interceptive extraction...


Recorded webinar - Oral Surgery - Prof. Testori

Sinus elevation surgery has become a sought-after part of implant dentistry. Procedures have evolved over the last 25 years to a point where sinus grafting surgery is considered one of the most...


Dental billing platform company, Vyne Dental, has acquired patient communications company, Operability, LLC. The acquisition also includes Operability’s OperaDDS platform, which launched in 2011 to...


Authors: Monica Giani, Umberto Pagliaro, Lorenzo Franchi, Roberto Rotundo, Michele Nieri

Purpose. The aim of this randomized clinical trial with blinded examiner was to compare the efficacy of four different methods of enhancing oral hygiene motivation in: (i) reducing the full-mouth...


 
 
 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events

 
 

Copyright © 2021 - All Rights Reserved
ISSN 2767-1178

Top