HOME - Clinical cases - Oral Hygiene & Prevention
 
 
09 April 2023

Nonpublication and selective outcome reporting of oral health trials

Over half the registered trials were unpublished


Less than one-quarter of oral health trials are registered in a public registry. However, no study has assessed the extent of study publication and selective outcome reporting bias in the field of oral health.

In this study, researchers identified oral health trials registered between 2006 and 2016 in ClinicalTrials.gov. The team assessed whether results of early discontinued trials, trials having an unknown status, and completed trials had been published and, among published trials, whether outcomes differed between the registered record and the corresponding publication.

Scientists included 1,399 trials, of which 81 (5.8%) were discontinued, 247 (17.7%) had an unknown status, and 1,071 (76.6%) were completed. The registration was prospective for 719 (51.9%) trials. Over half the registered trials were unpublished (n = 793, 56.7%).

To explore the association between trials publication and characteristics of trials, researchers performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Trials conducted in the U.S. (P = 0.003) or Brazil (P < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of publication, whereas trials registered prospectively (P = 0.001) and industry-sponsored trials (P = 0.02) were associated with decreased odds.

Among the 479 published trials with completed status, the primary outcomes of 215 (44.9%) articles differed from that registered.

Major discrepancies consisted of the introduction of a new primary outcome in the published article (196 [91.2%]) and the transformation of a registered secondary outcome into a primary outcome (112 [52.1%]). In the remaining 264 (55.1%) trials, primary outcomes did not differ from that registered, but 141 (53.4%) had been registered retrospectively.

This study highlights the high rate of nonpublication and selective outcome reporting in the field of oral health. These results could alert sponsors, funders, authors of systematic reviews and the oral health research community at large to combat the nondisclosure of trial results.

Diakonoff H, Khalil G, Jungo S, Treluyer JM, Fron-Chabouis H, Smaïl-Faugeron V. "Nonpublication and Selective Outcome Reporting of Oral Health Trials." Journal of Dental Research. 2023;0(0). doi:10.1177/00220345231158544.

Related articles

Researchers from the Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences at King’s College London have conducted the first randomised controlled trial for the treatment of Grade III...


Stress and anxiety are emotional states that often accompany patients who have to receive dental treatments, leading them to postpone or avoid treatments with the consequent deterioration of their...


Patient-centered trial design improves recruitment and retention, increases participant satisfaction, encourages participation by a more representative cohort and allows researchers to better meet...


This study answered the research question “Is the risk of tooth sensitivity lower when calcium-containing bioactive desensitizers are used with dental bleaching in adults compared with...


Read more

For a variety of reasons, orthodontic intervention is often overlooked as a viable modality to correct occlusal, axial, rotational, and space discrepancies before undertaking fixed prosthetic...


Congratulations to Ane Poly, D.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D., a clinical assistant professor in the UF Department of Endodontics, who was recently chosen as the college’s representative to the Council of...


ONEDAYBIOTECH products garner honor as one of the 16th Annual Readers’ Choice Top 25 Implant Products


National leader in oral health integration and equity joins CareQuest Institute executive team.


Henry Schein, Inc. (Nasdaq: HSIC), the world’s largest provider of healthcare solutions to office-based dental and medical practitioners, today announced its plan to reduce the size of its Board of...


 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events