HOME - Clinical cases - Implantology
 
 
09 December 2022

Short tuberosity implants: survival rate in diabetic vs non-diabetic patients

By Valentina Viganò, University of Milan


A study conducted by a team of researchers from King Saud University's Department of Prosthetic Sciences compared the success of short tuberosity implants in two types of patients, namely those with type 2 diabetes and non-diabetic patients. Diabetes can affect implant success, in particular type 2, which is more widespread among the population. If diabetes is not managed, it can reduce bone remodeling around the implant site, delays wound healing and leads to a less efficient immune response. In diabetic patients, we find a higher percentage of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis.

What is very important when performing an implant, the researchers point out, is to guarantee its survival inside the patient's oral cavity, which occurs through the osseointegration and stability of the implant itself. To achieve these objectives, it is necessary to carefully evaluate the quality and thickness of the alveolar bone, as well as to adequately choose the surface and length of the implant. Implant failure is around the corner if an implant is placed in poor quality bone or in an area where there is bone resorption.

When choosing to place an implant on a diabetic patient, clinicians should carefully evaluate parameters such as the plaque index, the depth of the periodontal pockets and the loss of the bone crest. In particular, this is based on the amount of bone that the length and thickness of the implants to be used are decided, while the capacity for osseointegration depends on the quality of the bone.

In order to have greater implant success among patients with type 2 diabetes, there are short tuberosity implants on the market that aim to minimize tissue damage and facilitate stability in areas of the alveolar bone that have a low quantity and poor bone quality. Moreover, the reduced length of these implants also brings a lower risk of developing paresthesia due to surgery, allows easier removal of the implant in case of failure and provides less general discomfort for the patient. These implants also have a lower overall cost and application time shorter than that used with traditional systems.

Despite these positive points, the research in question has however demonstrated that diabetics, due to their altered glycemic status, have periodontal and radiographic parameters below normal compared to those of non-diabetic patients. The hypothesis of performing successful short tuberosity implants cannot therefore be endorsed. It is therefore important, for the long-term stability of these implants, to control crucial factors such as the glycemic index and plaque.

Huda I. Tulbah, Abdulaziz Alsahhaf, Hamad S. AlRumaih, Fahim Vohra and Tariq Abduljabbar. “Clinical Evaluation of Short Tuberosity Implants among Type 2 Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: A 5 Year Follow-Up.” Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct; 58(10): 1487. Published online 2022 Oct 19. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101487


Related articles

The aim of this study was to compare peri-implant clinical and radiographic status and levels of advanced glycation end products in peri-implant sulcular fluid in waterpipe users and cigarette...


Read more

Penn Dental Medicine students and faculty were featured prominently at the 2026 IADR/AADOCR/CADR General Session & Exhibition, held March 25-28 in San Diego, California.


When patients brush their teeth before heading to bed, many assume their manual brush removes enough plaque.


35-year healthcare veteran who scaled dental and Medicaid programs to over $1 billion in revenue joins as LightSpun enters critical growth phase on the heels of


The dental profession is mourning the loss of Byoung In Suh, a pioneering scientist, educator, and entrepreneur whose work helped define modern adhesive dentist


This study was not funded by any organization or institution or any research grant company.


 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events