Interfacility transfer for management of traumatic injuries has sharply increased over the past two decades. This trend began in the early 21st century when severely injured patients expediently transferred to a level I trauma center were noted to have improved outcomes. Transfer rates began to increase, although the benefits of escalating to a higher level of care for those with less severe injuries was not as apparent. This was especially noted in the context of isolated maxillofacial fractures, which even today remain among the most frequently transferred injuries despite rarely requiring emergent operative treatment or inpatient admission.
There is little in the published literature addressing the incidence or utility of interfacility transfer for isolated maxillofacial fractures. To date, existing studies have been limited by small, single institution cohorts or only assessed maxillofacial injuries as a minor component of a broader analysis. The decision to initiate transfer is complex but thought to be driven by a need to rule out head or cervical spine injuries, obtain maxillofacial specialist evaluation, or both.
Socioeconomic status may also influence decision to transfer. Regardless, some authors have suggested that most transfers for maxillofacial injuries are unnecessary as the majority of patients are discharged from the recipient emergency department (ED) with no clinical indication for inpatient admission or intervention. These transfers thus consume ED resources, may delay evaluation of patients with more urgent medical problems, and cost millions of dollars in healthcare expenditures annually. An improved understanding of transfers for maxillofacial injuries could help reduce unnecessary escalations of care and mitigate healthcare expenditures. Unfortunately, the magnitude of this problem including basic information such as incidence of transfer remains unknown.
Purpose
Interfacility hospital transfer for isolated midfacial fractures is common but rarely clinically necessary. The purpose of this study was to generate nationally representative estimates regarding the incidence, risk factors, and cost of transfer for isolated midface fractures.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2018 to identify patients with isolated midface fractures. The primary predictor variable was hospital trauma center designation (Level I, Level II, Level III, and nontrauma center). The primary outcome variable was hospital transfer. Total ED charges were also assessed. Covariates were demographic, medical, injury-related and hospital characteristics. Researchers used descriptive, bivariate and multiple logistic regression statistics to evaluate the incidence and predictors of interfacility transfer.
Results
During the study period, there were 161,022 ED encounters with a midface fracture as primary diagnosis, of which 5,680 were transferred (3.53%). In an unadjusted analysis, evaluation at a nontrauma center, level III trauma center, nonteaching hospital and numerous demographic, medical, and injury-related variables were associated with transfer.
In the adjusted model, the strongest independent predictors for hospital transfer were evaluation at a nontrauma center, level III trauma center or level II trauma center, any Le Fort fracture, orbital floor fracture, history of cerebrovascular event and cervical spine injury.
The average ED charge per encounter was $7,206 ± 9,294 for a total nationwide charge of approximately $1.16 billion. Transferred subjects had total ED charges of $97 million, not including additional charges at the recipient hospital.
Conclusion
Isolated midface fractures are transferred infrequently, but given the high incidence have substantial healthcare costs. Predictors of transfer were mixed rather than clustered within one variable type, although it is likely that transfers are driven in part by lack of access to maxillofacial specialists given the predominance of hospital covariates. Programs evaluating necessity of transfer and facilitating specialist evaluation in the outpatient setting may reduce healthcare expenditures for these injuries.
Cameron C. Lee et al. "Interfacility Emergency Department Transfer for Midface Fractures in the United States." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 22 October 2022. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.10.010
Restorative dentistry 17 April 2026
Patient Perceptions of New Robotic Technologies in Clinical Restorative Dentistry
Patient perception research has failed to focus on burgeoning technology within the dental field.
Editorials 17 April 2026
Some admissions experiences can make an applicant feel like a statistic being analyzed or, as first-year Florida dental student Nate Fordham put it, like a “mushroom”: kept in the dark and fed...
Products 17 April 2026
BioHorizons’ Tapered Pro Conical Named to 16th Annual Readers’ Choice Top 25 Implant Products
Streamline your workflow with BioHorizons. Tapered Pro Conical offers a single, color-coded prosthetic platform for all full-arch cases.
News 17 April 2026
Following AI Voice Perio, voice-driven charting expands to restorative exams, enabling single-provider clinical documentation in Denticon.
Cosmetic & Reconstructive Dentistry recently announced the creation of a new scholarship program supporting graduating seniors from Fairfield’s public high schools who plan to pursue studies in...