HOME - Clinical cases - Orthodontics
 
 
10 June 2025

Presurgical Orthodontics versus No Presurgical Orthodontics: Treatment Outcome of Surgical-Orthodontic Correction for Skeletal Class III Open Bite


Background

It has long been claimed that presurgical orthodontics is crucial to the outcome of surgical-orthodontic treatment for dentofacial deformity. However, in the literature, the effect of presurgical orthodontics on the treatment outcome remains controversial. The purpose of the study was therefore to investigate the effect of presurgical orthodontics on the treatment outcome in terms of facial aesthetics, occlusion, stability, and efficiency.

Methods

Thirty-three adult patients with skeletal class III open bite corrected by Le Fort I posterior impaction and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy were included. The patients were divided into two groups: 13 received presurgical orthodontics, and 20 did not. Cephalometric radiographs and study models were used to evaluate the treatment outcome.

Results

There were no between-group differences in facial aesthetics, overbite, or Peer Assessment Rating score. Overjet was larger in the no–presurgical orthodontics group than in the presurgical orthodontics group, but both were within normal limits. Both groups had similar maxillary and horizontal mandibular stability. Although the vertical mandibular stability was worse in the no–presurgical orthodontics group than in the presurgical orthodontics group, the direction of instability was favorable for open bite correction. Finally, longer treatment time was required in the presurgical orthodontics group compared with the no–presurgical orthodontics group (512 ± 103 days versus 342 ± 127 days; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results suggest that in surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal class III open bite, presurgical orthodontics has no clinically significant effects on facial aesthetics, occlusion, or stability. However, presurgical orthodontics has a significant adverse effect on efficiency. Patients receiving presurgical orthodontics undergo longer treatment time than those receiving no presurgical orthodontics.


Authors: Liao, Yu-Fang; Chiu, Yu-Ting; Huang, Chiung-Shing; Ko, Ellen Wen-Ching; Chen, Yu-Ray

Source: https://journals.lww.com/

Related articles

This peer-reviewed orthodontics article summarizes clinical evidence from Dental press journal of orthodontics (2026). It focuses on findings that may help dental professionals evaluate treatment...


Partnership with Eversmile makes o scillating s ystem available through HSO in the United States.


This peer-reviewed orthodontics article summarizes clinical evidence from Dental press journal of orthodontics (2026). It focuses on findings that may help dental professionals evaluate treatment...


Partnership with Eversmile makes o scillating s ystem available through HSO in the United States.


This peer-reviewed orthodontics article summarizes clinical evidence from PloS one (2026). It focuses on findings that may help dental professionals evaluate treatment decisions, patient outcomes, or...


Read more

Jen Kim Field, chief sustainability officer at Henry Schein and president of the Henry Schein Cares Foundation, answers questions for Dentistry Today about the group’s achievements


The education-first program offered learning for the entire dental practice, with practical insights spanning the full patient journey and focused on improving workflows, collabora


AAO and Stand for the Silent Unite Communities This Month to Shine a Light on Bullying Prevention


Sometimes a small act of generosity can make a tremendous impression, especially on a 7-year-old.


This peer-reviewed endodontics article summarizes clinical evidence from Journal of dentistry (2026). It focuses on findings that may help dental professionals evaluate treatment decisions, patient...


 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events