HOME - Clinical cases - Oral Hygiene & Prevention
15 January 2020

Prevention of plaque and gingivitis: manual or powered brushing?

Giulia Palandrani

It is widely known that the presence of high levels of plaque cause gingivitis. Powered toothbrushes are now generally regarded to be more efficacious than manual toothbrushes in removing plaque and maintaining or improving the gingival condition.  
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an oscillating/rotating/pulsating powered toothbrush on plaque and gingivitis prevention over a 9‐months period.      

A total of 122 subjects ≥18 years of age in good general health and with at least five teeth per quadrant and no pockets ≥5 mm were included.   At baseline,after a preexperimental phase of 3 weeks, with the aim to motivate and to improve the level of their gingival health, the subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: manual brushing with no interdental cleaning (MB), manual brushing and floss (MBF), or powered brushing and no interdental cleaning (PB).  
Clinical parameters  
Gingival condition was assessed using the bleeding on marginal probing (BOMP) index; the absence or presence of bleeding was scored within 30 seconds of probing on a scale of 0 to 2 (0 = non‐bleeding; 1 = pinprick bleeding; 2 = excess bleeding).   Staining of teeth at the vestibular sides was scored according to the Gründemann Modification of the Staining Index (GMSI)   Plaque was assessed using the modified Quigley and Hein plaque index (QHPI); the absence or presence of plaque was recorded on a six‐point scale (0 to 5; 0 = no plaque, and 5 = plaque covered more than two‐thirds of the tooth surface).  Gingival abrasion lesions were scored (GAS) according to the method described by Van der Weijden and Versteeg. The greatest diameter of the lesion was recorded using a peridomtal probe placed across the long axis of the lesion.   Clinical examinations were performed at day 0, baseline, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 9 months. At the baseline, 10‐week, and 6‐month appointments, all subjects received a new brush head or toothbrush and floss.    

Bleeding scores at the final visit for the MB group was 0.65 and for the MBF and PB groups was 0.58 and 0.57, respectively. No significant difference among groups could be detected at this point.   At the final visit at 9 months, the overall plaque scores were lower for all regimens. The MB group had a score of 1.57, and MBF and PB groups had scores of 1.44 and 1.16, respectively. Significant differences between the PB group and the other two groups were detected (P = 0.002).   No Gingival abrasion lesions were reported in the present study, and there were no statistically significant differences in GAS scores among groups. The data showed that all regimens were safe.     The recorded brushing time at 6 months was 129.5 seconds for the PB group, 121.6 seconds for the MBF group, and 111.3 seconds for the MB group. This resulted in a statistically significant difference between the PB and MB groups (P = 0.006).       

All regimens maintained lower levels of plaque and bleeding compared to the intake levels at day 0.
However, the powered toothbrush maintained lower plaque levels for 9 months more effectively and maintained an improved gingival condition for ≥6 months compared to the manual toothbrush with or without the use of floss.      

For additional informations:  Comparison of the Use of Different Modes of Mechanical Oral Hygiene in Prevention of Plaque and Gingivitis

Related articles

Authors: Monica Giani, Umberto Pagliaro, Lorenzo Franchi, Roberto Rotundo, Michele Nieri

Purpose. The aim of this randomized clinical trial with blinded examiner was to compare the efficacy of four different methods of enhancing oral hygiene motivation in: (i) reducing the full-mouth...

Author: Katherine Pfaff

Early in the pandemic, dental hygienists were deemed at high risk for contracting COVID-19 by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). However, a study conducted through a...

Eating disorders (ED), such as Anorexia or Bulimia, are serious psycho-social illnesses that affect adults and adolescents mainly. Individuals affected by...

Peri-implant mucositis is an inflammation of the mucosa around dental implant. Clinically, it is characterized by mucosal bleeding on peri-implant ...

The pits and fissures at the occlusal surfaces of molars are retentive areas for food debris and dental plaque and are at an increased risk for development of...

Read more

Philips Avent, a mother, and childcare product corporation, has launched a new line of products, including an orthodontic-friendly pacifier. The new line is designed to aid in feeding babies and to...

Author: Giacomo Tarquini

Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease caused by the formation of a bacterial biofilm that, especially in predisposed subjects, may lead to periodontal ligament destruction and alveolar bone...

Independent dental implant and oral healthcare company, Keystone Dental Inc., completed a financing round that netted $25 million, led by investors, Nantahala, and joined by Accelmed and Migdal...

Dental caries and tooth wear remain an oral public health issue affecting nearly 100% of the adult population.  When the amount of lost tooth structure is important, often either a complete...

According to a recent report, Valuates Reports, a market analysis firm, has forecast the dental consumables market to grow at a CAGR of 3.9% between 2021 and 2027. The market is expected to reach...


Most popular




Copyright © 2021 - All Rights Reserved
ISSN 2767-1178