HOME - Clinical cases - Implantology
 
 
13 May 2021

Implant bed preparation: conventional drilling vs piezoelectric osteotomy

Lara Figini


Conventional rotary drilling is the most common approach for preparing the implant bed, but there are other predictable ways to achieve this preparation, including the piezoelectric osteotomy (PO), first applied by Vercellotti, which allows hard tissue to be cut without damaging soft tissues such as oral mucosa, blood vessels, nerves, or Schneider’s membrane, as it is less invasive. The main disadvantage of the PO, however, is the time required to prepare the implant site, greater than the conventional drilling.


Materials and methods
In a Spanish study, published on Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, March 2021, the authors compared the primary and secondary implant stability between placement with piezoelectric osteotomy and conventional drilling, comparing marginal bone losses as a secondary objective.
An electronic search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases, besides a manual search.


Results
A total of 153 articles were retrieved, 39 from Pubmed, 44 from Scopus, and 70 from the Cochrane Library. After removing duplicates, 112 articles (1 from the manual search) were screened, and 9 were finally selected for qualitative and statistical analyses. Piezoelectric surgery is a predict medium- and long-term survival rates and marginal bone losses were similar between the two comparison groups, piezoelectric osteotomy and conventional preparation, and there was no difference for the ISQ implant stability quotient values for primary stability. However, implants placed with piezoelectric osteotomy showed a smaller decrease in the implant stability quotient (ISQ) during the osseointegration period and a higher ISQ value for secondary stability.


Conclusions
From the results of this review, which must be compared with other data from similar reviews, it can be concluded that piezoelectric surgery is a predictable and valid alternative to conventional drilling for implant bed preparation.


Clinical implications
This study contributes further information on peri-implant bone tissue at 3 and 6 months after implant placement with piezoelectric osteotomy or conventional drilling and provides an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies.


For additional information: Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling: systematic review and meta-analysis.


Related articles

Authors: Roberto Pistilli, Marco Esposito, Carlo Barausse, Andrea Balercia, Lorenzo Bonifazi, Jacopo Buti, Pietro Felice

A within-person randomised controlled trial to compare the outcome of site preparation for two zygomatic oncology implants per zygoma using conventional preparation with rotary drills or...


Read more

Products     08 September 2026

Women in Dentistry Series

Paul Feuerstein sits down with Sandra Hirsch, president, CEO, and co-founder of Zyris.


News     08 September 2026

Trust AI Launches New Dental RCM Hub

Partnership with the Wehrle Implant Immersion Center adds implant faculty review and live carrier calls to every claim.


The American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) is pleased to announce the appointment of Krista Paternostro Bower, MPA, CAE, as its new Executive Director.


Students recently headed back to class for the current academic year, but Texas A&M College of Dentistry is looking ahead as deadlines approach for the dental Class of 2031 and the


This peer-reviewed oral pathology article summarizes clinical evidence from Oral oncology (2026). It focuses on findings that may help dental professionals evaluate treatment decisions, patient...


 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events