10 November 2020

---

EARLY IMPLANT LOADING IN THE ATROPHIC POSTERIOR MAXILLA: AN 11-YEAR RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF 1-STAGE LATERAL VERSUS CRESTAL SINUS LIFT AND 8-MM-LONG HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED IMPLANTS

Authors: G. Cannizzaro, P. Felice, D. R. Ippolito, M. Lazzarini, E. Velasco-Ortega, M. Esposito

---

OBJECTIVES: To compare 10- to 16-mm-long implants inserted into maxillary sinuses augmented with a lateral approach versus 8-mm-long implants placed in crestally augmented sinuses, both loaded early after 45 days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty partially or fully edentulous patients having 3 to 6 mm of residual crestal bone height and at least 4 mm thickness below the maxillary sinuses were randomised according to a parallel group design to receive either one to three 10- to 16-mm-long hydroxyapatite- coated implants (20 patients) after lateral sinus lift with 50% anorganic bovine (Bio-Oss) and 50% autogenous bone, or 8-mm-long implants (20 patients) after crestal sinus lift with autogenous bone. All implants were submerged and left to heal for 45 days before being loaded. Within one week after abutment connection, implants were loaded with screw-retained fully acrylic provisional prostheses. Definitive metal-ceramic prostheses were provisionally cemented 45 days after abutment connection. Outcome measures were: prosthesis or implant failure, any complications, and radiographic peri-implant marginal bone level changes. All patients were followed up to 11 years after loading.

RESULTS: One patient per group dropped out. One implant failed in the short implant group versus five implants in three patients from the longer implant group, the difference being not statistically significant (difference in proportions: 0.11; P = 0.604; 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.36). Three prostheses in the long implant group could not be fitted or were replaced versus one crown on short implants, the difference being not statistically significant (difference in proportions: 0.11; P = 0.604; 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.36). Six complications occurred in six patients from the short implant group versus ten complications in seven patients from the long implant group, the difference being not statistically significant different (difference in proportions: 0.053; P = 1.000; 95% CI = -0.265 to 0.357); however, two major postoperative complications occurred in the longer implant group: one abscess and one sinusitis, both of which determined the complete failure of the treatment in two patients (four implants lost). After 11 years, a total of 1.26 mm of peri-implant marginal bone had been lost at long implants and 0.64 mm at short implants, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (difference: 0.62 mm, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.99; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: In atrophic maxillary sinuses with a residual bone height of 3 to 6 mm, 8-mm short implants placed in simultaneously crestally lifted sinus might be a preferable choice than one-stage lateral sinus lift for placing longer implants, since the former appear be associated with lower morbidity. Implants placed with an insertion torque superior to 35 Ncm can be early loaded at 6 weeks.

For additional information:  http://www.clinicaltrialsindentistry.com/847-2/