21 November 2025

---

Teaching implant dentistry in the predoctoral curriculum: a report from the ADEA Implant Workshop's survey of deans

---

In 2004, a survey of the deans of U.S. and Canadian dental schools was conducted to determine the implant dentistry curriculum structure and the extent of incorporating implant dentistry clinical treatment into predoctoral programs. The questionnaire was mailed to the deans of the fifty-six dental schools in advance of the ADEA Implant Workshop conference held in Arizona in November 2004. Out of the fifty-six, thirty-nine responded, yielding a response rate of 70 percent.

Thirty-eight schools (97 percent) reported that their students received didactic instruction in dental implants, while one school (3 percent) said that its students did not. Thirty schools (86 percent) reported that their students received clinical experience, while five schools (14 percent) reported that theirs did not. Four schools (10 percent) did not respond to this question.

Fifty-one percent of the students actually receive the clinical experience in restoring implants, with the range of 5–100 percent. Of those schools that provide clinical experience in restoring implants, four schools (13 percent) reported that it is a requirement for them, while twenty-eight schools (88 percent) reported that it is not a requirement for them. Three schools (9 percent) did not respond. The fee for implants is 45 percent higher than a crown or a denture, with a range of 0–100 percent. Twenty-nine schools (85 percent) indicated that they did receive free components from implant companies, while five schools (15 percent) did not.

The conclusions of this report are as follows:

1) most schools have advanced dental education programs;

2) single-tooth implant restorations are performed at the predoctoral level in most schools;

3) implant-retained overdenture prostheses are performed at the predoctoral level in most schools;

4) there is no predoctoral clinical competency requirement for surgical implant placement in all schools that responded to the survey;

5) there is no predoctoral clinical competency requirement for implant prosthodontics in most schools that responded to the survey;

6) prosthodontic specialty faculty are often responsible for teaching implant prosthodontics at the predoctoral level;

7) periodontics and oral and maxillofacial faculty are commonly responsible for teaching implant surgery at the predoctoral level;

8) support from implant companies is common for dental schools, with most providing for implant components at discounted costs; and

9) there is a lack of adequately trained faculty in implant dentistry, which is a significant challenge in providing predoctoral students with clinical experience with dental implants.

Authors: Vicki C. Petropoulos, Nancy S. Arbree, Dennis Tarnow, Michael Rethman, Jay Malmquist, Richard Valachovic, W. David Brunson, Michael C. Alfano
Source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/