HOME - News - Editorials
 
 
17 April 2019

Direct pulp cupping: what is the most effective therapy?

Lorenzo Breschi


When pulp tissue exposure occurs, it is fundamental to protect and seal the pulpal tissue from noxious agents to prevent irreversible pulpitis or necrosis. Dental trauma, deep caries or iatrogenic proceedings are considered the main reasons for pulp exposure. When the pulpal tissue is involved, in absence of bleeding and signs of inflammation, direct pulp capping is commonly recommended.
This clinical procedure mainly consists in the application of a biocompatible material at the level of the exposed pulp to seal the communication between the pulp chamber and the dentinal substrate. The thin barrier of biomaterial has a twofold intent: to protects the pulp complex and, consequently, to preserve the tooth vitality through a natural mechanism of potential tissue repair, that leads to the formation of reparative dentin. In literature, it has been widely documented that dental pulp could form a hard tissue barrier (dentin bridge) after direct capping of pulp thanks to the induction of differentiation of odontoblast-like cells from dental pulp that produce tertiary dentin in the exposed area.
In order to obtain a successful outcome after pulp capping, the characteristics of the material employed, such as the biocompatibility, the antibacterial properties, the sealing capability and the ability to induce tissue healing, are of absolute importance.

A recent review published by Anabela B. Paula et al. compared the effectiveness of different direct pulp biomaterials. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) cement, calcium hydroxide cement, tricalcium silicate cement, and adhesive systems were considered and evaluated in terms of success rate, inflammatory response, and dentin bridge formation. The authors identified 819 studies but only 46 articles were included in the systematic review.  The results of the study showed a better clinical performance of MTA cement compared to calcium hydroxide cement. However, no differences were detected when MTA was compared to tricalcium silicate.
MTA proved to be a good bioactive, biocompatible and anti-bacterial material, with the ability to maintain the seal over time. However, the long setting time, the poor handling, the high cost, and the potential to decolorate the tooth are some of the clinical disadvantages compared to other materials. 
The work of Anabela B. Paula concluded that even if tricalcium silicate performed better in terms of inflammatory response and quality of dentin bridge, MTA showed the higher success rate. The employment of dental adhesives as pulp barriers were discouraged because of the reduced number of clinical successful results over time.    


For additional informations: 
Direct Pulp Capping: What is the Most Effective Therapy?—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tag

Related articles

The Blind Spot     12 May 2020

Predictive Abilities

Author: Prof. Luca Pani

The Blind Spot, a section of Dentistry33 magazine, described  from a few years ago, how one of the next innovations of digital health will be the technology ...


Editorials     17 March 2020

Covid-19: A needful effort

On March 11th, the WHO pronounced its concerns both about the alarming levels of spread and severity, and by the alarming levels of inaction. They have...


Editorials     12 February 2020

Communication in Dentistry

Is it important to communicate with world around us? Why do we have to learn about communication? Does it really need to be considered a fundamental aspect of ...


The beginning of a new year means new projects, new opportunities and new research possibilities. There are no doubts that dentistry has made remarkable...


Editorials     31 December 2019

End of the year

Dear Colleagues, December 2019 marks the first “Christmas Season” since the introduction of Dentistry33. It is therefore time to end the year with a...


Read more

The restoration of an endodontically treated tooth (ETT) has been widely discussed in the literature. Most of the available RCTs showed that premolars restored  with a fiber post and a single...


Co-authors: F. Scotti, M. Mandaglio, S. Decani, E. Baruzzi

An 83-year-old female patient arrives in urgency complaining of noticeable exacerbation of the symptoms at the level of oral mucous. The patient, non-smoker...


Author: Lorena Origo

In the current situation of COVID-19 emergency, all nations support the need to limit dental clinical activity exclusively to emergency care. In parallel, it is necessary to prepare for the following...


In the latest issue (May 2020) of The Angle Orthodontist a systematic review was published about the effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) on ...


Long-term studies have shown that there is no significant difference between the success rates of implants placed in natural alveolar bone and those placed in...


 
 
 
 

Newsletter

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events