HOME - Clinical cases - Prosthodontics
20 November 2019

Inlay and Onlay VS Crowns: which guarantees the longest survival?

Simona Chirico

The use of restorative materials to adhere to the dental surfaces and to preserve as much dental tissue as possible, has determined and conditioned the choice of the dentists in rehabilitating teeth with caries or abrasions. We are increasingly opting for partial indirect restorations compared to the total ones, allowing, in this way, to restore not only the functionality of the single element, but also to guarantee aesthetics. But are these types of partial restorations, such as inlays and onlays, as reliable as the classic crowns? What is their survival over time? The study by Vagropoulou et al confirmed that these restorations are as safe as crowns, analyzing the 5-year survival rate.  

Materials and methods
An electronic search was performed in various electronic databases to identify articles, published between 1980 and 2017. A total number of 2849 papers were retrieved initially, but only 9 studies were selected for inclusion. The heterogeneity of the studies did allow neither a meta-analysis nor any meaningful comparison between types of restorations or materials.  The search terms were splited into 4 groups: inlay, onlay, inlay+onlay, crown. They analyzed the 5-year survival rate and the complications of failure.  

The mean survival rate was for:
Inlays: 90.89%
Onlays: 93.5%
Inlay + Onlay: 99.43%
Crowns 95.38%  

Statistical analysis demonstrated caries to be the main biological complication for all types of restorations, followed by root fracture  and endodontic problems. Ceramic fractures represented the most common technical complication of the material restoration, followed by loss of retention and porcelain chipping.

The 5-year survival rate for inlays, onlays and crowns is very high, exceeding 90%. So indirect partial restorations are a good alternative for the total ones.  

For additional informations:  Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies

Related articles

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth with post and core restorations has been extensively studied in the last 20 years. Yet, the association between tooth type, location in the dental arch...

Several prosthodontics rehabilitation processes are needed to recreate a correct masticatory function. The provisional stage is quite important and materials employed in this phase are not completely...

Co-author: Allegra Comba

When discussing about restorative dentistry and prosthodontics, rehabilitations with CAD/CAM high performance materials are an alternative to traditional...

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth is always a topic of crucial attention for dentists. If until a few years ago, the therapeutic choice of...

Co-authors: Storelli S, Del Fabbro M, Scanferla M, Romeo E

Implant placement can be limited by anatomical conditions that may be overcome with different solutions: reduced dimension implants, bone regeneration procedures or...

Read more

The restoration of an endodontically treated tooth (ETT) has been widely discussed in the literature. Most of the available RCTs showed that premolars restored  with a fiber post and a single...

Co-authors: F. Scotti, M. Mandaglio, S. Decani, E. Baruzzi

An 83-year-old female patient arrives in urgency complaining of noticeable exacerbation of the symptoms at the level of oral mucous. The patient, non-smoker...

Author: Lorena Origo

In the current situation of COVID-19 emergency, all nations support the need to limit dental clinical activity exclusively to emergency care. In parallel, it is necessary to prepare for the following...

In the latest issue (May 2020) of The Angle Orthodontist a systematic review was published about the effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) on ...

Long-term studies have shown that there is no significant difference between the success rates of implants placed in natural alveolar bone and those placed in...




Most popular