HOME - Clinical cases - Prosthodontics
 
 
30 July 2019

Nanoceramics, PICN and lithium disilicate for CAD/CAM system: mechanical properties and internal fit.

Simona Chirico


Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) was introduced in dentistry forty-years ago, and gained popularity worldwide because of advancements in restorative materials with characteristics such as crack tolerance, ease of clinical use and good performance. Among the most common CAD/CAM materials we found: nanoceramics, vitreous ceramics interpenetrated in a resin matrix (PICN) and lithium disilicate. These materials belong to different families of ceramics and therefore have different properties. 

But which material among these guarantees a better result?

The study published by Goujat et al, in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, tried to give an answer by analyzing the mechanical properties and internal fit of these CAD / CAM materials.      

MATERIALS AND METHODS
The materials tested in this study were a PICN material (Vita Enamic), 2 composite resin nanoceramics (Lava Ultimate; 3M ESPE and Cerasmart; GCDental Products), and a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD). Mechanical properties were evaluated according to ISO norm DIS 6872:2013. Bar-shaped specimens (18×3×3 mm) were prepared and submitted to a 3-point bend test using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. In addition, identical cavities were prepared in 60 human mandibular extracted molars (n=15) and optically scanned to receive mesioocclusodistal inlays milled with the 4 materials tested in a CEREC Inlab milling machine. The replica technique and a stereomicroscope (×20) were used to measure the internal fit of the inlays at 9 preselected locations. All data were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison or Games-Howell test (a=.05).

RESULTS
As can be seen from the table below (table 1), the best results were recorded by lithium disilicate.

CONCLUSIONS
Despite all these CAD / CAM materials are valid for a restoration, the best results were recorded for the lithium disilicate IPS e.max CAD followed by the Cerasmart nanoceramic

(Photocredit by Dr Roberto Spreafico)


For additional informations: 
Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials

  • Table 1: results

    Table 1: results

Related articles

The increased aesthetic demand, without sacrificing the preservation of biological structures, has led to the development and use, in recent years, new generations...


Restoration of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with class III defects is a challenging procedures because the choice of which rehabilitation...


Facing a structurally-compromised teeth has always been a challenging procedure among dentists. Teeth with extensive deep caries, crown fracture and short ...


Survival of dental restorations presents temporal limits, despite the improvement of oral health education and the diffusion of fluoride treatments. Sooner or later, to be restored due...


Read more

Incipient caries lesions (ILs) around the surfaces of banded or bonded teeth are a common orthodontic problem. Current literature indicates that this is...


Resective and regenerative procedures are applied in security for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. The ultimate aim of periodontology is to ...


The edentulous posterior maxillary region often presents with unique challenging conditions in implant dentistry. Limited bone height secondary to...


The study published on the Journal of Dentistry in May 2019  quantified and compared practice patterns of treatment for deep occlusal carious lesions among Japanese dentists, and tested the...


 
 

Newsletter

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events