HOME - Clinical cases - Prosthodontics
 
 
30 July 2019

Nanoceramics, PICN and lithium disilicate for CAD/CAM system: mechanical properties and internal fit.

Simona Chirico


Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) was introduced in dentistry forty-years ago, and gained popularity worldwide because of advancements in restorative materials with characteristics such as crack tolerance, ease of clinical use and good performance. Among the most common CAD/CAM materials we found: nanoceramics, vitreous ceramics interpenetrated in a resin matrix (PICN) and lithium disilicate. These materials belong to different families of ceramics and therefore have different properties. 

But which material among these guarantees a better result?

The study published by Goujat et al, in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, tried to give an answer by analyzing the mechanical properties and internal fit of these CAD / CAM materials.      

MATERIALS AND METHODS
The materials tested in this study were a PICN material (Vita Enamic), 2 composite resin nanoceramics (Lava Ultimate; 3M ESPE and Cerasmart; GCDental Products), and a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD). Mechanical properties were evaluated according to ISO norm DIS 6872:2013. Bar-shaped specimens (18×3×3 mm) were prepared and submitted to a 3-point bend test using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. In addition, identical cavities were prepared in 60 human mandibular extracted molars (n=15) and optically scanned to receive mesioocclusodistal inlays milled with the 4 materials tested in a CEREC Inlab milling machine. The replica technique and a stereomicroscope (×20) were used to measure the internal fit of the inlays at 9 preselected locations. All data were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison or Games-Howell test (a=.05).

RESULTS
As can be seen from the table below (table 1), the best results were recorded by lithium disilicate.

CONCLUSIONS
Despite all these CAD / CAM materials are valid for a restoration, the best results were recorded for the lithium disilicate IPS e.max CAD followed by the Cerasmart nanoceramic

(Photocredit by Dr Roberto Spreafico)


For additional informations: 
Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials

  • Table 1: results

    Table 1: results

Related articles

Premolars are the most difficult elements to restore and have a high failure rate due to their anatomical position and the forces they undergo. Therefore the choice of the material to restore...


With the development of CAD/CAM system, nowadays the most used materials in the prosthetic fields are: zirconia and lithium disilicate. In particular, in a...


The increased aesthetic demand, without sacrificing the preservation of biological structures, has led to the development and use, in recent years, new generations...


Inlay and overlay are a good and right choice in case of large carious and restorative defects. The introduction of CAD/CAM system gives the possibilities to...


Read more

USA     20 February 2020 - 22 February 2020

Midwinter Meeting 2020

Where: McCormick Place West Building, 2301 S. Indiana Ave., ChicagoWhen: on February 20-22, 2020Topic: Restorative dentistry, Oral Cancer Symposium, Implantology, Health and Wellness, The business...


Dentists must regularly determine the best adhesive cementation protocol for glass-ceramic restorations on posterior teeth. A few in vivo follow-up...


Peri-implant mucositis is an inflammation of the mucosa around dental implant. Clinically, it is characterized by mucosal bleeding on peri-implant ...


Intrabony cista in the jaw are the most common benign findings in the oral and maxillofacial area. The best treatment option to manage intrabony cystic lesions...


Clinical management of periodontally compromised teeth with advanced mobility remains an arduous challenge to the dentists. Splints are being used to overcome...


 
 
 
 

Newsletter

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events