the procedure of warping, usually and interchangeably called morphing, elicit profile aesthetic preferences in orthodontic patients using the most common cephalometric softwares. It’s a method makes it easy to construct a prediction picture of the face based on changes to the soft-tissue profile effected by orthodontic or surgical treatment. In the age of new generations increasingly influenced by selfies and photo editing applications on smartphones, this study aims to determine general aesthetic preference and to find out whether it was affected by sex, age or real profile.
Materials and Methods: 72 patients (12-20 years old; 37M; 35 F) at early stage of therapy at our dental offices valued their own and others digitized series of three distinct distortions from initial lateral cephalograms and photos translated into soft-tissue changes of third lower of the face. We didn’t indicate photos showing the real profiles to not influence their answers. Chi-square test and Goodman-Kruskal lambda index (λ) were used to compare and measure the association of patients’ preferences according to sex, age, facial profile. (P=0.005)
Results: both sexes deemed positively orthognathic profiles whereas prognathic and retrognathic profiles were the least preferred (χ²=0.78). Age and own patient profile don’t seem to have significative influence on choices. The poor association of the considered variables is highly presumed due to their reciprocal independence (λ=0; λ=0.02).
Conclusions: Generational models influence the concept of attractiveness. Explaining limits and viewing possible results of orthodontic therapies prevent disappointments. Patients’ expectations should be never neglected by orthodontists. Morphing procedure offers distorted images useful like predictive method but also tool of communication to assay the self-perception and opinions of our patients.
Clinical significance: Understanding the patient's aesthetic needs within the orthognatodontic treatment plan can be considered the prerequisite for a "conscious" therapy in which the patient's expectations and the clinician's operational possibilities converge towards the common goal of achieving the best possible result. Using traditional digital tools, as done in this study, can be a winning weapon in communicating with the patient. The morphing tool of cephalometric software through the warping function, which we can customize according to our indications, provides us with a simple and effective help for this purpose.
Author: Tommaso Albonetti
2021 Midwinter Meeting goes virtual. 156th Midwinter Meeting: Thursday – Saturday, Feb. 25 – 27, 2021The bright future of dentistry will be on display at the innovative virtual 2021 Midwinter...
Oral surgery 25 February 2021
Authors:Christian Bacci, Elisa Bardhi, Annalisa Angelini, Marny Fedrigo, Chiara Castellani, Gastone Zanette
Aim of the study: The aim of the study is to describe a significant case of the management of a patient with systemic pathologies, affected by a large mandibular cystic lesion, with long-term...
Digital Dentistry 25 February 2021
Oral Hygiene & Prevention 25 February 2021
Francesco De Angelis, Camillo D’Arcangelo, Francesca Chella, Maurizio D’Amario, Mirco Vadini
The introduction of the rubber dam (RD) dates back more than 150 years ago and today it is still considered a fundamental element of the "standard of care" in modern dentistry. Despite obvious...