HOME - Clinical cases - Orthodontics
 
 
04 December 2019

Clean-up after orthodontic debonding using fluorescent light

Davide Elsido


In the latest issue (November 2019) of the Angle Orthodontist an article was published about a technique developed to help the removal composite during debonding of brackets with respect to time needed, composite remnants, and tooth substance loss. After orthodontic treatment, the enamel surface should be returned to its original condition as close as possible without any composite remnants and without damaging the tooth surface. So far, no consensus exists as to the most efficient technique to remove composite remnants after bracket debonding. Despite many different approaches used in daily practice, the tungsten bur remains the most preferred tool to remove composite remnants. Tungsten carbide burs are effective in removing composite remnants but result in a rough enamel surface.

Therefore, enamel polishing is required to avoid bacterial adhesion. This is recommended to be performed with Sof-Lex discs or similar. Although the ideal procedure for removing composite has been the subject of several investigations, less effort has gone into establishing a technique that facilitates the removal of composite remnants. The fluorescence properties of luminescent chemicals and tooth structures are different under a wavelength of 405 nm.

Therefore, fluorescence can be a good tool to use as a noninvasive method for detecting composites.
Two operators: an experienced orthodontist (A) and an undergraduate student (B) received six models each and were asked to remove the composite remnants by both a conventional light source (CLS), and fluorescent inducing light (FIT). The time taken was recorded, and a postoperative scan was digitally superimposed on the preoperative scan to quantify number of teeth with composite remnants and volume and thickness of enamel loss and composite remnants. Compared to CLS, both operators needed significantly less time when using the FIT method and degree of enamel loss, height, and volume of composite remnants and total remaining composite remnants were significantly reduced. Due to infiltration of composite after etching, complete removal of the remnants is almost never possible without damaging the enamel surface. By conventional light, the primer and sealant agent may still remain on the teeth even though, clinically, the surface might look clean. The resin infiltrated enamel could be responsible for color changes of the enamel in the long term. Due to the FIT method, this infiltrated enamel layer becomes visible, which will then be removed during the clean-up process.

Enamel scratches should be avoided as much as possible since they enhance bacterial adhesion and cannot be eliminated by polishing. Improper handling of the tungsten carbide bur at the line angle and cervical areas can lead to visible grooves and the pressure against the enamel is operator-dependent.

Conclusions: Cleanup after orthodontic debonding with the FIT was superior regarding time needed and removal of composite remnants. Total enamel loss reduction was operator-dependent.

For additional informations:  Evaluation of a Fluorescence-aided Identification Technique (FIT) to assist clean-up after orthodontic bracket debonding.

Related articles

Open bite  is considered as a deviation in the vertical relationship of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches, characterized by a lack of contact between opposing segments of teeth. Open bite...


In the latest issue (December 2019) of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics an article was published to identify factors that ...


In the latest issue (November 2019) of The Angle Orthodontist an article was published about a retrospective study to evaluate the treatment effects produced...


In specific types of cases, removal of one mandibular incisor can greatly facilitate orthodontic treatment. There are 2 primary indications: (1) severe...


There is increasing interest in the role of the orthodontist both in screening for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and as a practitioner who may be valuable in...


Read more

The restoration of an endodontically treated tooth (ETT) has been widely discussed in the literature. Most of the available RCTs showed that premolars restored  with a fiber post and a single...


Co-authors: F. Scotti, M. Mandaglio, S. Decani, E. Baruzzi

An 83-year-old female patient arrives in urgency complaining of noticeable exacerbation of the symptoms at the level of oral mucous. The patient, non-smoker...


Author: Lorena Origo

In the current situation of COVID-19 emergency, all nations support the need to limit dental clinical activity exclusively to emergency care. In parallel, it is necessary to prepare for the following...


In the latest issue (May 2020) of The Angle Orthodontist a systematic review was published about the effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) on ...


Long-term studies have shown that there is no significant difference between the success rates of implants placed in natural alveolar bone and those placed in...


 
 
 
 

Newsletter

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events