Impacted third molars are directly or indirectly the underlying cause of numerous disorders in the mouth, jaw and facial regions like: pericoronitis and regional pain, abscess, trismus, distal caries and periodontal pocket of the second molar, development of follicular cysts etc. As a result their removal is often necessary, however, frequently leads post-operative complications for the patient such as pain, swelling and trismus, and in the worst cases, temporary or permanent lesion of the inferior alveolar nerve. Several therapeutic protocols have thus been evaluated to support improvements in the post-operative period.
Piezoelectric surgery for example allows micrometric and selective flaps while ensuring maximum surgical precision, causing minimal damage to soft tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In a clinical study published on Oral Surgery February 2019, the authors compared surgery of impacted third molars performed under general anesthesia using a piezoelectric handpiece compared to standard surgical handpiece. Thirty patients who underwent routine third molar extraction were included in the study. Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate the position of third molars. The patients were randomly subdivided and the split mouth technique was used in which each side (left or right) of the mouth was randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Hence each patient served as their own control. In one group, a piezoelectric handpiece was used, while a conventional handpiece was used for the second group. All aspects of preoperative care, general anaesthesia, surgery and postoperative care were standardised for the two groups. The following parameters were recorded; time of surgery, bleeding during surgery, post-operative swelling, post-operative pain, associated complications and post-operative nerve injury.
No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of pain and swelling.
Less bleeding was found with the use of the piezoelectric device compared to standard handpiece surgery; however, the surgical time was longer in group A. No reports of trauma to the lips or intra-oral soft tissues. Two cases of postoperative paraesthesia (6.7%) occurred in standard surgery.
From the data of this study, which must however be confirmed by other similar studies, it can be concluded that the use of a piezoelectric device is a valid alternative to standard surgery in third molar surgery. The use of a piezoelectric device is advocated in difficult cases especially where there is inferior alveolar nerve approximation.
Piezoelectric handpiece is best reserved for difficult and deeply impacted third molars with nerve approximation otherwise standard surgical handpiece remains the gold standard.
For additional informations:
Comparison of a piezoelectric and a standard surgical handpiece in third molar surgery
Oral surgery 09 October 2019
Periodontology 03 July 2019
Editorials 16 October 2019
Authors: M. Gobbo, G. Ottaviani, K. Rupel, M. Biasotto
A female patient was sent to the Medicine and Oral Pathology clinic of the Dental Clinic of Trieste for the evaluation of an intensely radiopaque foreign body...
Oral surgery 09 October 2019