HOME - Clinical cases - Oral surgery
 
 
11 September 2019

Suture materials: which one to choose?

Giulia Palandrani


Sutures are the most frequently used medical device for wound closure. Similarly to other materials being implanted in the human body, suture materials are also considered to be a foreign body and factor contributing to a larger incidence of infections due to its microbial adherence.
A study, published on Clinical Oral Investigations, compare four different suture materials used in oral surgery in terms of their biocompatibility, degree of bacterial colonization and inflammatory reaction, influence on wound healing, and basic clinical parameters.  

MATERIALS AND METHODS         
A total of 32 healthy patients indicated for surgical extraction of four totally impacted wisdom teeth were included in the study. Unilateral upper and lower wisdom teeth have been extracted at the same time. In the mandible envelope design for mucoperiosteal flap was used, and in the maxilla standard triangular flap was performed. Several interrupted sutures were placed in order to obtain primary wound healing.
After a period of 4–5 weeks, impacted molars from the other side were extracted with the same procedure.
Each wound was closed with a different suture material. Stitches were removed 7 days postoperatively.
Patients were given uniform postoperative instructions: Amoxicillin 500 mg  and chlorhexidine solution 0.2%, three times a day for 7 days; Ibuprofen 400 mg four times a day for the first 2 days      

Suture materials:

  •  Sofsilk® (non-absorbable natural multifilament wax coated silk; NA-Multi);
  • Surgipro® (non-absorbable synthetic monofilament polypropylene; NA-Mono);
  • Polysorb® (absorbable multifilament co-polymer of glicolide and lactide 9:1 
  • Lactomer® coated with Ca-stearate and Ε-caprolactone; A-Multi);
  • Caprosyn® (absorbable monofilament co-polymer of E-caprolactone, glicolide, trimethylen carbonate, lactide 6:2:2:1
  • Polyglytone 6221®; A-Mono).  

RESULTS  
All suture threads were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and substantially more amount of dental plaque was found on multifilament sutures.  After the microscopic analysis the highest number of inflammatory cells was found around NA-Multi (Sofsilk®) and the smallest number around NA-Mono (Surgipro®).  A total of 128 suture samples were examined for microbial adherence, and significantly lower amount of microbial load was found on monofilament compared to multifilament sutures with the least bacterial load registered on polypropylene (NA-Mono Surgipro®) suture. This is mainly due to its impeccably smooth surface.   Study’s findings showed better healing around all synthetic materials NA-Mono (Surgipro®), A-Mono (Caprosyn®), and A-Multi (Polysorb®) compared to natural multifilament NA-Multi (Sofsilk®).   NA-Mono (Surgipro®) caused the greatest discomfort to patients among all suture types and exhibited the least postoperative amount of slack.   In this study the incidence of postoperative delayed infection was registered in 10 out of 128 wounds and 7 out of those 10 infected sites were in the group of multifilament sutures. It appears that physical configuration of the threads rather than its chemical composition plays a role in inflammatory reaction.  

CONCLUSIONS  
Minimal tissue-drag, easiness during knot tying, and a structure that is not affected by saliva and blood are the main reasons why the polypropylene suture (NA-Mono Surgipro®) was better than the alternative ones in this study. Very close to polypropylene suture was the A-Mono (Caprosyn®) which is the monofilament suture with exceptional pliability and ease of intraoperative handling.   According to these results, whenever it is possible, it is strongly preferable to use synthetic monofilament sutures in order to obtain the best soft tissue healing, reduce the risk of postoperative infection, and alleviate the suturing after oral surgery procedures. 


For additional informations: 
Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study.

Related articles

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)  is a concentration of platelets derived from the centrifugation of autologous whole blood. It is extensively used to promote soft...


Surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar is a common treatment performed with a therapeutic or prophylactic aim. Complications associated with this practice are various; nonetheless,...


Intrabony cista in the jaw are the most common benign findings in the oral and maxillofacial area. The best treatment option to manage intrabony cystic lesions...


Maxillary third molar extraction is commonly performed in dental clinics. The traditional techniques is a combination of luxation and removal forces...


Restoration of teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure due to deep caries, resorption or traumatic injury with fracture line extended under gingival...


Read more

The restoration of an endodontically treated tooth (ETT) has been widely discussed in the literature. Most of the available RCTs showed that premolars restored  with a fiber post and a single...


Co-authors: F. Scotti, M. Mandaglio, S. Decani, E. Baruzzi

An 83-year-old female patient arrives in urgency complaining of noticeable exacerbation of the symptoms at the level of oral mucous. The patient, non-smoker...


Author: Lorena Origo

In the current situation of COVID-19 emergency, all nations support the need to limit dental clinical activity exclusively to emergency care. In parallel, it is necessary to prepare for the following...


In the latest issue (May 2020) of The Angle Orthodontist a systematic review was published about the effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) on ...


Long-term studies have shown that there is no significant difference between the success rates of implants placed in natural alveolar bone and those placed in...


 
 
 
 

Newsletter

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events