Sutures are the most frequently used medical device for wound closure. Similarly to other materials being implanted in the human body, suture materials are also considered to be a foreign body and factor contributing to a larger incidence of infections due to its microbial adherence.
A study, published on Clinical Oral Investigations, compare four different suture materials used in oral surgery in terms of their biocompatibility, degree of bacterial colonization and inflammatory reaction, influence on wound healing, and basic clinical parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 32 healthy patients indicated for surgical extraction of four totally impacted wisdom teeth were included in the study. Unilateral upper and lower wisdom teeth have been extracted at the same time. In the mandible envelope design for mucoperiosteal flap was used, and in the maxilla standard triangular flap was performed. Several interrupted sutures were placed in order to obtain primary wound healing.
After a period of 4–5 weeks, impacted molars from the other side were extracted with the same procedure.
Each wound was closed with a different suture material. Stitches were removed 7 days postoperatively.
Patients were given uniform postoperative instructions: Amoxicillin 500 mg and chlorhexidine solution 0.2%, three times a day for 7 days; Ibuprofen 400 mg four times a day for the first 2 days
All suture threads were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and substantially more amount of dental plaque was found on multifilament sutures. After the microscopic analysis the highest number of inflammatory cells was found around NA-Multi (Sofsilk®) and the smallest number around NA-Mono (Surgipro®). A total of 128 suture samples were examined for microbial adherence, and significantly lower amount of microbial load was found on monofilament compared to multifilament sutures with the least bacterial load registered on polypropylene (NA-Mono Surgipro®) suture. This is mainly due to its impeccably smooth surface. Study’s findings showed better healing around all synthetic materials NA-Mono (Surgipro®), A-Mono (Caprosyn®), and A-Multi (Polysorb®) compared to natural multifilament NA-Multi (Sofsilk®). NA-Mono (Surgipro®) caused the greatest discomfort to patients among all suture types and exhibited the least postoperative amount of slack. In this study the incidence of postoperative delayed infection was registered in 10 out of 128 wounds and 7 out of those 10 infected sites were in the group of multifilament sutures. It appears that physical configuration of the threads rather than its chemical composition plays a role in inflammatory reaction.
Minimal tissue-drag, easiness during knot tying, and a structure that is not affected by saliva and blood are the main reasons why the polypropylene suture (NA-Mono Surgipro®) was better than the alternative ones in this study. Very close to polypropylene suture was the A-Mono (Caprosyn®) which is the monofilament suture with exceptional pliability and ease of intraoperative handling. According to these results, whenever it is possible, it is strongly preferable to use synthetic monofilament sutures in order to obtain the best soft tissue healing, reduce the risk of postoperative infection, and alleviate the suturing after oral surgery procedures.
Oral surgery 12 February 2020
Oral surgery 04 December 2019
Oral Hygiene & Prevention 20 May 2020
Author: Lorena Origo
In the current situation of COVID-19 emergency, all nations support the need to limit dental clinical activity exclusively to emergency care. In parallel, it is necessary to prepare for the following...