HOME - Clinical cases - Implantology
 
 
29 January 2020

Perimplantitis: how to decontaminate implant surface

Giulia Palandrani


Treatments using dental implants to replace missing teeth are effective and predictable. However, with the ever-growing popularity of implant treatments and the increasing number performed in recent years, the incidence of short and long-term complications has increased. One of these complications is peri-implantitis. The literature shows evidence of periimplantitis’s microbial etiology, with a microbiota that is very similar to advanced periodontitis, A systematic review of research published before January 2008 identified much evidence that poor oral hygiene, a history of periodontitis and/or of smoking are indicators of peri-implantitis risk. The therapies proposed for treating peri-implantitis are based on the evidence available for the treatment of periodontitis, and are aimed at reducing the bacterial load within peri-implant pockets and decontaminating implant surfaces. The objective of this review was to evaluate the information available in the literature as to the efficacy of different mechanisms for decontaminating implant surfaces.  

MATERIAL AND METHODS  
Of the 135 articles identified in the Internet search using Pubmed database, only 36 ful- filled the quality criteria. Studies in which the main topic was regenerative treatment of peri-implant defects were excluded. All literature reviewed analyzed the diverse methods of implant surface decontamination which were classified in:
- Physical Decontamination Methods: principally mechanical, such as implantoplasty, sandblasting systems, bicarbonate air-powder abrasion systems. Its objective is the elimination of toxins from the implant surface in order to produce a surface compatible with health, to promote reosseointegration.
-Decontamiation using laser: is based on its thermal effect, which denatures proteins and causes cellular necrosis.
-Chemical Decontamination and Antibiotic Therapy: involves the localized use of anti-microbial solutions such as topical chlorhexidine, tetracycline or minocycline, citric acid, hydrogen per- oxide or 35% phosphoric acid gel, in combination with mechanical debridement for eliminating hard and soft deposits  

RESULTS 
In non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis, mechanical therapy on its own would appear to be insufficient. Used in combination with chlorhexidine, it improves the clinical and microbiological parameters slightly, and the addition of local or systemic administration of antibiotics reduces bleeding on probing and probing depth. For this reason, non-surgical treatment should limit itself to the treatment of mucositis, as it will not resolve inflammatory lesions in cases of bone loss. For peri-implantitis treatment, surgical access is recommended in order to achieve complete removal of granulation tissue and to obtain access for the decontamination of the implant surface. In fact there would appear to be sufficient consensus that, for the treatment of peri-implant infections, the removal of the biofilm from the implant surface should be supplemented by chemical decontamination.

CONCLUSIONS
Due to the great heterogeneity of studies, which have used empirical combinations of different decontamination methods, and the variablility of the implant surfaces treated, it is impossible to establish a single protocol for implant decontamination for peri-implatitis treatment. 


For additional information: De-contamination of dental implant surface in peri-implantitis treatment: A literature review. 

Related articles

There is still no accordance on the antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to prevent failures or postoperative infections in healthy patients undergoing standard implant surgery.Some authors proposed...


Dental implantology is currently a routine therapy performed on young patients but also on older patients, with or without systemic diseases. Despite the fact that dental implant therapy has been...


Recent advances in dental implants have led to an increase in the number of patients treated, with survival rates of more than 95% in a healthy population. ...


It is estimated that 1 in 2 women and 1 in 5 men over the age of 50 may develop a fracture due to osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is defined as a skeletal disease...


Nowadays patients with fully edentulous maxilla may benefit from different prosthetic rehabilitations. One of them  is the implant-supported overdenture...


Read more

Bisphosphonates are widely used for the treatment of abnormal bone metabolism for example in osteoporosis. Their continuative use leads to a strong inhibition...


Author: Luigi Campopiano

1. In the light of the fact that the 9 trillion euro of Italian savings are more than 90 % invested in Italy in euros, it is a good idea to expand the scope of investments to other markets that...


Demand of esthetic outcomes is becoming more and more frequent in dentistry and ceramic laminate veneers represent one of the main choices to functionally and...


There is still no accordance on the antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to prevent failures or postoperative infections in healthy patients undergoing standard implant surgery.Some authors proposed...


Editorials     28 July 2020

Welcome Summer 2020

Dear readers, Summer 2020 is definitely a strange and, under certain aspects, never existing season for our planet. The recent notorious burst of...


 
 
 
 

Newsletter

 
 
 
 

Most popular

 
 

Events